Medieval animal bone waste at Oegstgeest

In this Bachelor Thesis, the animal (mammal) bone remains of the Merovingian site of Oegstgeest were discussed. The Merovingian settlement at Oegstgeest was located along the Old River Rhine and was possibly part of a (inter)regional trade network. Agriculture and animal husbandry were important parts of its economy. A comparison was made between three different contexts; the waste pits, wells and the channel. The goal of this Bachelor Thesis was to show whether there are differences between the composition of these assemblages (age data, fragmentation, representation of elements etc.) and how these might be explained. Taphonomy was important for the interpretation of these differences. There are not many differences between the assemblages and the general patterns in these assemblages are largely the same. The archaeological features (waste pits, wells and the channel) probably had the same function; waste disposal. One of the most notable differences is that primarily the waste...Show moreIn this Bachelor Thesis, the animal (mammal) bone remains of the Merovingian site of Oegstgeest were discussed. The Merovingian settlement at Oegstgeest was located along the Old River Rhine and was possibly part of a (inter)regional trade network. Agriculture and animal husbandry were important parts of its economy. A comparison was made between three different contexts; the waste pits, wells and the channel. The goal of this Bachelor Thesis was to show whether there are differences between the composition of these assemblages (age data, fragmentation, representation of elements etc.) and how these might be explained. Taphonomy was important for the interpretation of these differences. There are not many differences between the assemblages and the general patterns in these assemblages are largely the same. The archaeological features (waste pits, wells and the channel) probably had the same function; waste disposal. One of the most notable differences is that primarily the waste pit material are more fragmented, which can indicate worse preservation conditions or the extraction of bone marrow (leads to splintering of bones). Another notable difference is the large amount of pig bones in the channel assemblage, compared to the other assemblages. This can be partially explained by the influence of post-depositional taphonomic processes, but the differences are too big to solely ascribe them to taphonomic processes. It is hard to identify, which taphonomic processes took place and how large of an impact they had on the assemblage. Thus the conclusions presented in this research are indications of what could have underlain the observed patterns. Future research should focus on identifying taphonomic signatures (preservation of the bones etc.) and try to establish the influence of post-depositional processes on the formation of the assemblages. Furthermore larger datasets would give a more representative picture of the assemblages.Show less

Leiden University Student Repository

Documents

In Collections

Medieval animal bone waste at Oegstgeest