In this thesis, it is examined how the period between ca. 150 and 350 AD is represented in the macrobotanical record of the Meuse-Demer-Scheldt area. Furthermore, an attempt is made to shed light...Show moreIn this thesis, it is examined how the period between ca. 150 and 350 AD is represented in the macrobotanical record of the Meuse-Demer-Scheldt area. Furthermore, an attempt is made to shed light on the developments which must have led to the assumed demographic decline during this period. This is done by relating the macrobotanical outcome to four prediction models which were based on four existing explanatory theories on the decline, formulated by Groenman-van Waateringe (1983), Roymans and Gerritsen (2002), Slofstra (1991) and Verwers (1998). These scholars disagreed about the exact start and end date of the decline. Although the macrobotanical record does not show an unambiguous chronological overview for the Meuse-Demer-Scheldt area, most data refer to a gradual start between 150 and 200 AD and an end date around 350 AD. It is revealed that the macrobotanical data lack evidence about essential trends formulated in the prediction models. It was impossible to significantly enhance or weaken either of the four explanatory theories. However, it is clear that the period between 150 and 350 AD was not a fruitful phase for the Meuse-Demer-Scheldt area. More research and a uniform presentation of results in macrobotanical studies were strongly recommended.Show less
