Artificial Intelligence become part of many areas of our life, throughout everyday application scenarios. Everyday billions of people interact with Artificial Intelligence enabled technologies,...Show moreArtificial Intelligence become part of many areas of our life, throughout everyday application scenarios. Everyday billions of people interact with Artificial Intelligence enabled technologies, without even realizing it. The aim of the paper is to review and identify how the principles of freedom of speech apply to AI supported technologies and chatbots. To answer this question this paper gives an overview on how AI works, what are the philosophies behind the freedom of speech, and how freedom of speech is applied, and AI technologies are used in social media. To answer the question this paper investigates the question both from an individual, and from social aspects. The individual interpretation is applied also to the AI, treating it as an individual. The social aspect is investigated including the impact of AI technologies behind social media content selection systems. To answer the question this paper investigates how AI technologies can help realizing the values of free speech and whether the existing applications of AI systems in social media content management systems helps or prevents realizing those values.Show less
This research examines if and to what extent the Bosphorus case and Opinion 2/13 have shifted the applicable jurisdiction away from the ECtHR and towards the CJEU. First, by reviewing the current...Show moreThis research examines if and to what extent the Bosphorus case and Opinion 2/13 have shifted the applicable jurisdiction away from the ECtHR and towards the CJEU. First, by reviewing the current literature on Bosphorus and Opinion 2/13. Second, by analysing on an individual basis if and to what extent both cases have shifted the applicable jurisdiction away from the ECtHR and towards the CJEU. Finally, this research concludes that only the Bosphorus case has shifted the applicable jurisdiction away from the ECtHR and towards the CJEU. Furthermore, this research concludes that with issuing Opinion 2/13, the CJEU made sure that the applicable jurisdiction would remain with the CJEU. The research ends with the observation that the EU is still required to accede to the EU and therefore, the CJEU has to make amends to eventually make it possible for the EU to accede to the ECHR.Show less
