Background: A common consequence after a traumatic injury is the development of a depressive disorder and one of the known risk and protective factors are the coping styles used to control the...Show moreBackground: A common consequence after a traumatic injury is the development of a depressive disorder and one of the known risk and protective factors are the coping styles used to control the distress. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the predictive value of the use of passive and active coping styles on the development of depressive symptoms within the first year after trauma. It also aimed to assess potential gender differences within this association. Methods: 556 traumatic injury patients participated in the study. They were recruited from two academic hospitals in NL completed the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) and the Utrechtse Coping Lijst (UCL) questionnaire at T2. The UCL contained the active coping styles Active Approach, Social Support, Emotional Expression and Reassuring Thoughts and the passive coping styles Palliative Reaction, Avoidance Behaviour and Passive Reaction Pattern. Linear Mixed Models were used to analyse the data. Results: Greater use of Emotional Expression style predicted higher overall depressive symptoms. Greater use of Avoidance Behaviour and Passive Reaction Pattern predicted higher overall depressive symptoms and Palliative Reaction predicted lower depressive symptoms over time. A higher score on Active Approach significantly predicted lower depressive symptoms specifically for men. Conclusions: Different effects have been found in men and women for active coping styles. Most passive coping styles create a risk factor for depressive symptom severity regardless of gender. Implications entail risk monitoring and possible training interventions. Inconsistent results make implementation of intervention strategies difficult.Show less
Introduction: harm expectancy violation is a strategy that enhances exposure therapy for PTSD patients. Before exposed to trauma reminders, patients formulate anticipatory harm expectancies...Show moreIntroduction: harm expectancy violation is a strategy that enhances exposure therapy for PTSD patients. Before exposed to trauma reminders, patients formulate anticipatory harm expectancies regarding the occurrence of aversive events. Exposure is maintained until this expectancy is violated, creating crucial learning effects. However, harm expectancies are under investigated. Our goal is to gain more insight into harm expectancies prior to treatment and to investigate other related variables. Methods: this study is part of the overarching IMPACT-study of Oprel et al. (2018). CA-PTSD patients (N = 150) from PsyQ Psychotrauma departments filled in one standardized and one idiosyncratic harm expectancy prior to the first exposure session. PTSD symptom severity (CAPS-5), posttraumatic cognitions (PTCI) an emotion dysregulation (DERS) were measured at baseline. Relationships were examined using Spearman correlation analyses. The relationship between harm expectancy and PTSD severity, possibly mediated by posttraumatic cognitions and emotion dysregulation, was examined using PROCESS. Results: small significant positive correlations were found between the standardized harm expectancy and other variables. The idiosyncratic harm expectancy only correlated with the standardized harm expectancy. A small proportion of harm expectancy variance was explained by predictors in the mediation. Posttraumatic cognitions and emotion dysregulation were no significant mediators. Discussion: results indicate that the harm expectancy instrument is not a good measure and that there might be no relation between harm expectancy levels and PTSD-pathology related instruments. Secondly, harm expectancies might not be traced accurately with existing explicit techniques, since these cognitions might operate on a more implicit level. Measurement improvements were discussed.Show less
Background: The lockdown that ensued the COVID-19 pandemic severely impacted people’s mental health, the extent of which still needs to be further investigated. Young people and students are...Show moreBackground: The lockdown that ensued the COVID-19 pandemic severely impacted people’s mental health, the extent of which still needs to be further investigated. Young people and students are generally more susceptive and vulnerable to developing depression and suicide ideation. This study focused on the specific sample of university students. The student’s living situation (living alone vs. living with other people) and their perceived loneliness was assessed to determine the lockdown’s impact on their mental health, specifically on depressive symptoms and suicide ideation. Methods: A survey including Beck’s Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck’s Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS) and the De Jong-Gierveld Loneliness Scale (DJGLS) was sent out to students of Leiden University at two different time points in March 2020 (N=216) and during a follow-up in April and May 2021 (N=49).The data of 49 participants was analysed using paired samples t-tests and multiple linear regression analyses. Results: there was a significant increase in mean BSS scores (p = 0.020, M2020: 0.7 and mean2021:1.8), but not in mean BDI scores (p = 0.454, M2020:10.3 and M2021: 10.9). Adding living alone vs. living with people as another predictor in a regression analysis yielded non-significant results (BDI: p = 0.842; BSS: p = 0.716). The interaction between living alone and the scores on the DJGLS were also not significant (BDI: change in R2 =0.008 & p = 0.541; BSS: change in R2 = 0.045 & p = 0.089). Discussion: The results suggest that over the period of the lockdown the student’s mental health problems, specifically suicide ideation, increased. However, loneliness and the living situation did not impact the difference in scores. Both the universities and the appropriate governmental authorities should take action to support this vulnerable population. What specific aspect of the lockdown influenced the results needs further studies. Future research should additionally aim to severely increase the sample size as well as studying the long-term effects of this pandemic on students mental health.Show less
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a frequent consequence of childhood abuse (CA) and is assumed to be more severe than PTSD from adult trauma. PTSD can be treated well with trauma-focused...Show morePosttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a frequent consequence of childhood abuse (CA) and is assumed to be more severe than PTSD from adult trauma. PTSD can be treated well with trauma-focused treatment (TFT), but comorbidities such as suicidality and psychotic symptoms have been viewed as contraindications for using TFT. Aim: To identify the effects of TFT on suicidality in a population with CA-PTSD as well as the moderating effects of psychotic symptoms. Method: Baseline and post-treatment assessments of suicidality were investigated in 150 adult patients with CA-PTSD. Moderating effects of psychotic symptoms at baseline were investigated. Results: A reduction of suicidality was observed (z = -2.43, p = .015); for the majority of participants suicidality decreased (n = 47), while some participants experienced no change (n = 27) or an increase (n = 29) in suicidality. Only few participants (n = 21) showed comorbid psychotic symptoms at baseline. Psychotic symptoms at baseline were associated with higher suicidality (z = 2.391; p = .017), but after correction for multiple testing, not with PTSD symptoms (t(148) = -2.22, p = .028) at baseline. Psychotic symptoms did not modify PTSD or suicidality outcomes at post-treatment. Conclusion: A reduction of suicidality may be an overall trend in TFT, but no change or an increase in suicidality are also observed in participants. More research is needed on the role of psychotic symptoms. Suicidality should be closely monitored throughout treatment, and interventions to address immediate or extreme suicidality should be investigated further in future research.Show less
Background: Exposure to childhood maltreatment (CM) can induce hyperactive inflammatory responses, which can persist into adult life. Elevated levels of inflammation markers can impair brain...Show moreBackground: Exposure to childhood maltreatment (CM) can induce hyperactive inflammatory responses, which can persist into adult life. Elevated levels of inflammation markers can impair brain functioning and development, which can in turn increase the risk for psychopathology. Hence, inflammation might be one of the potential mechanisms explaining the link between CM and adult psychopathology. Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether inflammation might mediate the relationship between CM and internalizing psychopathology in adulthood. Additionally, the study aimed to determine whether this effect is specific to one or more subtypes of CM. Methods: A total of 116 adults participated in the study. CM was assessed using a combination of two questionnaires: the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS-PC) and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). Participants’ saliva samples were analysed for three pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α). The Internalizing Problems subscale from the Adult Self Report (ASR) questionnaire was used to determine internalizing psychopathology. Parallel mediation analyses were conducted to test the hypotheses. Results: Experienced childhood abuse and neglect both significantly predicted internalizing symptoms in adulthood. However, the associations were not mediated by pro-inflammatory cytokines. Conclusions: This study’s findings add to the extensive body of literature showing the longterm effects of CM on internalizing psychopathologies. Contrary to expectations, the mediation effect of inflammation in this relationship was not identified. As several methodological factors could have influenced the results, this outcome should not be considered as a firm disconfirmation of the mediation hypothesis. Further prospective studies addressing this question are warranted.Show less