This thesis analyses ‘odd deposits’ from the early medieval Low Lands coastal area (modern Netherlands and Belgium) and Anglo-Saxon England. ‘Odd deposits’ are deliberately placed in settlement...Show moreThis thesis analyses ‘odd deposits’ from the early medieval Low Lands coastal area (modern Netherlands and Belgium) and Anglo-Saxon England. ‘Odd deposits’ are deliberately placed in settlement context. They can be ritual or religious, but mundane as well. The deposits played a role in the several processes that sustained the early medieval settlement. The data for this thesis originates from official published archaeological reports and grey literature. This is ordered by material, date and context feature, to create a comparable overview. A variety of materials were used for ‘odd deposits’. Material categories include animal burials, animal skulls, human inhumations, pottery, stone artefacts, building material and plants/ wooden material. ‘Odd de-posits’ were placed at several settlement features. They are found within or in close association with earthfast buildings, enclosure ditches, sunken-featured buildings, wells and water pools. The data show us the great variety of objects and contexts used for ‘odd deposits’ in the early medieval Low Lands coastal area. There was a high local preference. Anglo-Saxon England was more homogenous when it concerns the deposition practice. Deposition took place in single or multiple events. Single event deposits were often associated with the construction or demolishing of features. ‘Odd deposits’ associated with the renewal phases of features often happened in multiple episodes. ‘Odd deposits’ could also have been part of a reciprocity system, where the deposition was used as a gift to ask the gods or ancestors for favours. The deposits can be analysed by object in combination with their context of deposition. Animal deposits of cattle, horse and dog had a high domestic value and are mostly found close or on the domestic area of the farmyard. This also counts for infant burials. Deviant burials, on the other hand, are mostly deposited at the edges of the settlements.Show less
Analyzing the spatial distribution of diagnostic ceramics, this study provides a more detailed insight into the development of the early to central medieval settlement located at Valkenburg De...Show moreAnalyzing the spatial distribution of diagnostic ceramics, this study provides a more detailed insight into the development of the early to central medieval settlement located at Valkenburg De Woerd. To doing so, both ceramics and features such as wells and ditches have been plotted using a Geographical Information System. This research concerning the analysis of pottery from De Woerd is the third in line and specifically focuses on ceramics found in the southern part of the settlement. In this thesis results of quantities of fabrics and vessel types are presented and discussed. All ceramics in a settlement context have been analyzed including those of two previous studies. The development of habitation is presented by both the spatial distribution of diagnostic ceramics as well as the topographical location of dated features. This discussion however also relates to the impact of site formation processes, since they will have had an impact on the spatial distribution of both ceramics and dated features. Especially a combination of ploughing and levelling has affected higher situated levees resulting in the disappearing of the original surface. Despite these site formation processes, both the assemblage of the northern and southern part of the settlement yielded similar ratios in fabrics and vessel types. This is also concluded when the assemblage from the settlement is compared to the overall collection of ceramics found in trench 510 located in a gulley. By combining all three collections and comparing this complete assemblage with other contemporaneous sites, it can be concluded that the ratios concerning fabric and vessel types, De Woerd fit well in the regional image of the use of pottery in the early medieval period. It is argued that habitation started at around AD 575/600 and continued into the Carolingian period. In the first half of the tenth century there may have been a short hiatus in habitation in the excavated part of the settlement. Habitation may have been present further east. The start of habitation linked to this later phase could be placed at around AD 950 and came to an end in the first half of the twelfth century. Based on the spatial distribution of diagnostic ceramics as well as the location of dated ditches and wells, it is concluded that all parcels on site were inhabited during the Merovingian and Carolingian period. During the Carolingian period, habitation shifted further in an eastward direction and the area became in use as agricultural land. In the central medieval period habitation in the excavated area consisted of a single farmstead, located at the southern part of the site.Show less
The aim of the study was to understand what distribution patterns tell us about Carolingian historical and economic processes in the Netherlands, and how this pattern was affected by post...Show moreThe aim of the study was to understand what distribution patterns tell us about Carolingian historical and economic processes in the Netherlands, and how this pattern was affected by post-depositional processes. This was done by investigating coins in relation to geographic layers and changes of distribution patterns through time were studied using 50-year time slices from 750 AD to 950 AD. Coins are mostly found along the coast and near major rivers in the centre of the Netherlands, with hot spots at known Carolingian trade settlements such as Dorestad, Domburg and settlements at the mouths of the Rhine and Meuse rivers. Other hotspots are found at Nijmegen, which was the site of a Carolingian palatium, and the northwest coast of the province of Friesland. While clay rich features of marine and fluviatile deposits favour the preservation of coins, it is likely that coins were mainly circulating in the vicinity of navigable waters. Frisian merchants were renowned in the Carolingian empire and beyond for their prominence in international trade and their core area coincides seamlessly with the coin distribution pattern. Coin circulation appeared to be at its peak during the reign of Charlemagne and Louis the Pious. Circulation then again diminished following political instabilities, Viking invasions and the gradual silting of the river Rhine after the death that were later to become trade centres of importance in the later Middle Ages after Dorestad went defunct in the 850s AD. Coins are infrequently found in many parts of the Netherlands. Large parts of the Netherlands were deemed inhospitable during the Carolingian era due to vast areas of peat bogs that were drained in the late Middle Ages and the modern era. The south and east of the country is characterized by deposits of cover sands was also found to be sparse in Carolingian coins. That the southern provinces of Noord-Brabant and Limburg were so thinly endowed with coins was a surprise, as these areas are known to have been close to the Carolingian heartland. The poor preservation qualities of metal objects in sand is only part of the answer why this is the case. The river Meuse and the southern provinces were found to have been of little interest to Frisian traders, who conceivably preferred the relatively neutral extremities of the Empire that were conductive to international trade. Perhaps coins in the Netherlands were principally a medium used by merchants in long distance trade, and not as readily used in local and regional trade along rural settlements.Show less
