One of the most important actors in Middle Eastern politics today is the Islamic Republic of Iran. This country has been the subject of much controversy over the past years, partly due to the fact...Show moreOne of the most important actors in Middle Eastern politics today is the Islamic Republic of Iran. This country has been the subject of much controversy over the past years, partly due to the fact that it is the only state in the world that officially bases its domestic policy and legal system on Shi’a Islam. However, the extent to which Shi’ism influences Iran’s foreign policy has been disputed. It has been argued by some that Iran’s behaviour on the international arena has more to do with political and economic interests than with defending their religion; others have claimed that, on the contrary, some of the country’s actions cannot be explained without taking into account the influence of the Shi’a identity. One situation that has been explained from both perspectives is Iran’s decision to support Armenia, rather than their Shi’ite neighbour Azerbaijan, in the Nagorno-Karabakh war of 1988-1994. This conflict presents an interesting case study in the question of the influence of Shi’ism on Iran’s foreign policy. Some have claimed that Iran’s support of Armenia aligned perfectly with the Shi’a ideology of supporting and uplifting the oppressed, viewing Azerbaijan as the aggressor in the situation, rather than a fellow Shi’ite ally. At the same time, it is undeniable that Iran’s partnership with Armenia has provided and continues to provide economic benefits to both states. As such, the question arises: to what extent did the Iranian regime’s Shia identity influence the country’s decision to support Armenia, rather than Azerbaijan, in the Nagorno-Karabakh war?Show less
This master thesis examines how the decision to intervene in Syria became thinkable, even logical, in the context of François Hollande’s discourse. It aims to answer the question how François...Show moreThis master thesis examines how the decision to intervene in Syria became thinkable, even logical, in the context of François Hollande’s discourse. It aims to answer the question how François Hollande legitimises the military intervention in Syria in the context of foreign policy discourse, and how this discourse in return is constructed and reinforced by France’s foreign policy ideology. Building on poststructuralist ontology, it inquires into the theoretical concept of foreign policy identity and the underlying mechanisms that allow and legitimise actions. It offers a thorough analysis of French foreign policy ideology as represented by the most influential political figure of France. In addition, it investigates how certain behaviour, e.g. the intervention in Syria, is made possible in the context of discourse. This thesis thus aims to illustrate how the discourse on a specific event – military action in Syria – relates to the foreign policy identity of France. It shows the mutual constitution of behaviour and ideology; French foreign policy behaviour is rooted in the context of ideology, but ideology in its turn also reinforces foreign policy.Show less
