Language learning has been a widely researched topic for many years. Most research that has been done on language learning focuses on the impact of external factors on language proficiency. However...Show moreLanguage learning has been a widely researched topic for many years. Most research that has been done on language learning focuses on the impact of external factors on language proficiency. However, no research has been done on the personal experiences of language learners and how these learners perceived these influences during this process. Therefore, this thesis researched the perceived impact of external influences on learners of English in the Netherlands, focusing on the perceived influences of education, engagement with media and participants’ own added perceived influences. This information can be helpful for educators and learners alike. The perceived impact of external influences was investigated with a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews using deductive and inductive coding. This study recruited recently graduated participants (1-4 years post-graduation) with different educational tracks. The interviews showed that Dutch participants with English as their second language (L2) perceived primary education to be of no influence because the participants received so little training during their primary education. Secondary education was perceived as incredibly helpful; additionally, it was perceived as rather boring. The influence of tertiary education depended on the subject of the degree rather than the participants' education level. Media engagement was perceived as a helpful tool that could add extra context and input to the training received during education. Negative influences of engaging with media pertained to content being generally addictive and desensitising to the real world. Media was also perceived as untrustworthy concerning the correctness of the language that is produced online. The oral proficiency of the 3 participants was also investigated by deductive coding of the transcripts using Communication Strategies (CS. These results were compared with the self-reports on their speaking abilities. This revealed that participants had a surprisingly accurate view of their speaking skills.Show less
One of the common misconceptions when it comes to teaching a second language to gifted students is that teachers expect gifted students to be better at learning a second language than non-gifted...Show moreOne of the common misconceptions when it comes to teaching a second language to gifted students is that teachers expect gifted students to be better at learning a second language than non-gifted students. Expectations are usually high, and when a student does not live up to these expectations, it causes frustration; not just for the student, but also for the teacher and the parents. This misconception stems from the fact that most gifted students show an extensive knowledge of their L1 (first language) at an early age. In theory, a gifted child should therefore be faster at picking up an L2 (second language) than non-gifted students: Hayes et al (1998, p. 179) states: “there is a strong connection between language ability and learning ability.” So hypothetically, with their advanced thinking skills, their more extensive verbal skills, and with their aptitude for learning, these gifted students should have little trouble with learning a second language. In practice, however, this does not always seem to be the case; gifted students do not automatically apply their abilities in learning second languages. For example, classroom practice shows that gifted students generally have greater difficulties with learning and memorizing vocabulary than non-gifted students. The study described in this thesis has multiple aims. First and foremost it aims to examine if there is a difference in the ways gifted and non-gifted students acquire English as a second language. Secondly it explores how language pedagogy as well as taking learning styles into account could benefit gifted students. This is in turn compared to the current classroom practice at the Rijswijks Lyceum. It should finally lead to the causes of these differences or similarities along with the consequences for gifted students.Show less
