The level of reading skills and the reading motivation are decreasing, causing more and more school-aged children to experience difficulties in reading. When reading in children is difficult, it is...Show moreThe level of reading skills and the reading motivation are decreasing, causing more and more school-aged children to experience difficulties in reading. When reading in children is difficult, it is less fun to do. They will read less often so their reading skills will not improve (negative reading spiral) although reading is an important skill to participate in society and labor market. The current study investigated the effectiveness of two different online reading interventions aimed at improving the reading performance and reading motivation of children with reading difficulties in grade 4/5: the online, individually, guided Universal Intervention of Literacy (UIL) based on explicit direct instruction (EDI) and the Reading Along (RA) reading method based on the guided oral reading method. The interventions differed in instructional approaches. The current study examined whether EDI is needed to improve the reading performance of children with reading difficulties. In addition, it was examined whether the change in reading motivation can be explained by the change in reading achievement, from the reading spiral. The children with reading difficulties, divided into three conditions, received the UIL or RA intervention or no additional reading support (BAU, control group). Reading performance of technical reading and reading motivation were measured before and after the intervention period. The analyses showed that the UIL and RA were effective in improving reading achievement among children with reading difficulties in grade 4/5 after a five-week intervention period. The children who followed the UIL or RA grew equally in reading achievement. This suggests that EDI is not needed to improve reading achievement in children with reading difficulties. In addition, the children in the UIL, RA and BAU condition grew equally in reading motivation. The suggests that the UIL and RA interventions were not effective in improving reading motivation. Finally, no correlation was found between the change in reading achievement and the change on reading motivation. Change in reading motivation cannot be predicted by change in reading performance.Show less
