Research master thesis | Linguistics (research) (MA)
under embargo until 2026-07-31
2026-07-31T00:00:00Z
Adjectival modification in the nominal domain is one of the broadly discussed issues in the field. In the current thesis I build on the novel observation that apart from those cases where the...Show moreAdjectival modification in the nominal domain is one of the broadly discussed issues in the field. In the current thesis I build on the novel observation that apart from those cases where the adjectival modifier is adjacent to the noun, languages such as Dutch also allow to have an overt mediating element in between the noun and the modifier resulting in ‘een groene kleur auto’ (‘a green colour car’) (cf., Kayne 2005). I call this element a dimension classifier and argue that it heads DimensionP. I treat adjectival modifiers as phrases (cf., Cinque 2010) generated in the specifier of it. Based on the syntactic distribution of different classes of modifiers in similar constructions in Dutch and Russian and their interpretational properties I argue for three possible ways to merge the modifier in the structure. In two of these scenarios DimensionP is itself embedded in a complex structure leaving room for a functional preposition ‘of’ and creating possessive relation with the noun. Based on the feature specification of the dimension classifier I derive two possible interpretations out of this structure. The third scenario does not assume a possessive relation between the noun and the modifier and is achieved due to DimensionP only. I show that this model is able to capture the distributional properties of modification with and without an overt dimension classifier in attributive and predicative positions as well as in case of modifying an indefinite pronoun. I hold that every modifier should be introduced by a dimension classifier that can be realised as a free-standing, bound or zero morpheme. I show all three of these possibilities for both Dutch and Russian based on the discussion of modifiers of material, origin, colour, shape, size and subjective comment.Show less
Research master thesis | Linguistics (research) (MA)
open access
2023-01-31T00:00:00Z
All Tukanoan languages have gender markers and classifiers, and both can be reconstructed to the proto-language to some degree. In this thesis, I provide a reconstruction of the development of the...Show moreAll Tukanoan languages have gender markers and classifiers, and both can be reconstructed to the proto-language to some degree. In this thesis, I provide a reconstruction of the development of the classifier system in the Tukanoan family, where I argue that it developed out of the older gender system morpho-syntactically, but that many of the synchronically found classifiers can morphologically be analysed as grammaticalized nouns. My arguments for this, as elaborated in this thesis, are as follows: i) all Tukanoan languages have similar gender markers which can probably be reconstructed for Proto-Tukanoan (Chacon 2021; in prep.); ii) the gender markers seem to have undergone grammaticalization at an early stage in the family; iii) many classifiers in the family are language-internal developments or can only be reconstructed for a sub-branch; iv) a few classifiers are widely found in the family and can be reconstructed for the proto-language, but these seem to be developments of either Proto-Tukanoan gender markers or originally complex forms. I analyse these complex forms as consisting of a gender marker in combination with some other marker. I furthermore provide an analysis of the development of the Proto-Tukanoan gender system, based on Chacon (2021; in prep), where I suggest that some of its morphological material may indicate borrowings from an Arawakan source. Lastly, by contributing to the reconstruction of the Proto-Tukanoan classifier system, this thesis may contribute to a reconstruction of classifiers in the wider area, as classifiers are a pervasive feature in non-Tukanoan languages as well, where the relatively gender-like morpho-syntactic characteristics of classifiers have been the subject of much discussion (e.g. Payne 1987; Aikhenvald 2000a, 10; Grinevald 2000, 81-82, 87).Show less
Research master thesis | Linguistics (research) (MA)
open access
In Dutch, one can order a drink, denoted by a mass noun, using phrases such as: Ik will graag twee (glazen) rode wijn, "I would like two glasses of red wine". Interestingly, the usage of the...Show moreIn Dutch, one can order a drink, denoted by a mass noun, using phrases such as: Ik will graag twee (glazen) rode wijn, "I would like two glasses of red wine". Interestingly, the usage of the classifier, in this case glazen ‘glasses’, is not obligatory. Borer (2005) argues that such sentences, without classifiers, are possible in a register she calls Restaurantese. This construction, however, is not possible with all adjective-noun combinations. Therefore, this study proposes two main hypotheses, similar to van Erkel (2020). First, one could argue that the acceptability of these configurations depends on the syntactic classification of the adjective. Second, one could argue that it depends on the relation between the adjective and the noun, which I refer to with the term combinability. There are different approaches one could take to define combinability. This study takes three different approaches: the collocation of the adjective and the noun; the familiarity of the combination; the chance one could find a combination on a menu, which I call the Restaurantese reading. Through different surveys, this study has shown that the syntactic level of the adjectives does not influence the acceptability of sentences in which you order drinks in Dutch. The combinability of the adjective-noun pair, on the other hand, plays a large role in the acceptability. This effect is, remarkably, not restricted to Restaurantese expressions. By comparing adjective-noun pairs that were ranking differently amongst the three approaches for combinability, I show that the Restaurantese reading is the best indicator for the acceptability of different adjective-noun pairs. Then I discuss the connection between the sentences with and without the overt classifier. I argue that the configurations without the overt classifier contain a covert classifier that introduces countability and the portion needed to express such sentences. Lastly, I note that the acceptability of these configurations is not set in stone. It is hugely dependent on cultural history and the usage of language by all its language users on the one hand, and one’s personal background and world knowledge on the other hand.Show less
