Financial scarcity and one’s income have long been studied in relation to people’s financial risk-taking behaviors. In recent years, however, a more recent concept has been introduced in the field...Show moreFinancial scarcity and one’s income have long been studied in relation to people’s financial risk-taking behaviors. In recent years, however, a more recent concept has been introduced in the field of economic psychology research, perceived financial scarcity, which refers to one’s subjective perception of their own financial standing. Considering its novelty, perceived financial scarcity has not been the subject of much research, and its relation to risky behavior even less so. The purpose of this study was to explore the associations between perceived financial scarcity and two dimensions of risk behavior, risk preference and risk tolerance, as well as observe the potential moderating effect of gender on these relationships. Using a sample of 100 participants recruited through an online platform, the results of our research indicated positive associations between risk preference and risk tolerance, in addition to a significant relationship between perceived financial scarcity and risk tolerance. Interestingly, no gender differences were found when testing risk preferences with perceived financial scarcity, while a significant effect of gender was uncovered for the association between perceived financial scarcity and risk tolerance. The results of the study can hopefully provide more clarity regarding the differences between risk preference and risk tolerance, in addition to providing more information that could break down harmful gender stereotypes.Show less
Financial scarcity and one’s income have long been studied in relation to people’s financial risk-taking behaviors. In recent years, however, a more recent concept has been introduced in the field...Show moreFinancial scarcity and one’s income have long been studied in relation to people’s financial risk-taking behaviors. In recent years, however, a more recent concept has been introduced in the field of economic psychology research, perceived financial scarcity, which refers to one’s subjective perception of their own financial standing. Considering its novelty, perceived financial scarcity has not been the subject of much research, and its relation to risky behavior even less so. The purpose of this study was to explore the associations between perceived financial scarcity and two dimensions of risk behavior, risk preference and risk tolerance, as well as observe the potential moderating effect of gender on these relationships. Using a sample of 100 participants recruited through an online platform, the results of our research indicated positive associations between risk preference and risk tolerance, in addition to a significant relationship between perceived financial scarcity and risk tolerance. Interestingly, no gender differences were found when testing risk preferences with perceived financial scarcity, while a significant effect of gender was uncovered for the association between perceived financial scarcity and risk tolerance. The results of the study can hopefully provide more clarity regarding the differences between risk preference and risk tolerance, in addition to providing more information that could break down harmful gender stereotypes.Show less
Itch is an unpleasant sensation that induces scratching and is often accompanied by psychological distress. Chronic itch, such as psoriasis or atopic dermatitis (eczema), has a lifetime prevalence...Show moreItch is an unpleasant sensation that induces scratching and is often accompanied by psychological distress. Chronic itch, such as psoriasis or atopic dermatitis (eczema), has a lifetime prevalence of 22% and often carries a marked psychological burden. Catastrophising of itch symptoms can inhibit coping, increase scratching and lower mood, which maintains scratching and creates a vicious cycle. The relationship between sex, gender and chronic itch is not well understood. More broadly, sex and gender differences often go overlooked – this is called the gender data gap. Therefore, the first research question was, to what extent does catastrophising affect the quality of life of patients with chronic itch? The second research question was, to what extent is there a difference in how catastrophising affects the quality of life of men and women with chronic itch? 27 patients with chronic itch (psoriasis or atopic dermatitis) filled in the Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS) adjusted for itch and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) online. Contrary to expectations, a simple linear regression analysis showed that catastrophising was not a significant predictor of quality of life. Furthermore, a multiple regression analysis showed that catastrophising does not affect the quality of life of men and women differently. Importantly, the results are limited by low sample size, lack of control variables and the use of convenience sampling. Further research into the relationship between itch catastrophising, quality of life and gender could greatly impact the lives of patients with chronic itch.Show less
Conflict resolution is an inherent aspect of human interactions, representing an essential skill for achieving desirable outcomes. Moreover, recognizing individual differences during conflict may...Show moreConflict resolution is an inherent aspect of human interactions, representing an essential skill for achieving desirable outcomes. Moreover, recognizing individual differences during conflict may help understand the origins of different opinions and develop targeted strategies to solve disagreements. This study investigates whether gender and age differences influence attack investment during a conflict task in which both sides compete for different reasons. Based on research showing that women display less preference for competition, I predicted that women invest less in attack than men. Similarly, considering studies on the risk-averse behavior of older generations, I expected older individuals to invest fewer resources in attack than younger people. Three hundred one participants performed an online computer-based decision-making game following the outline of the attacker-defender contest. Participants were randomly assigned to the attacker or defender role. Depending on the role, the tasks involved deciding how to use monetary units (MU) to attack the opponent or protect one’s endowment. Attack investment was defined as the amount of MU assigned to overpower the opponent by obtaining their resources. The results contradicted the predictions, as age and gender were not significant predictors of attack investment. Therefore, this study challenges potential stereotypes claiming aggressive behavior to be more prevalent for a particular age group or gender. I discuss factors such as revising the research design and considering other individual differences that may impact the results’ significance. Altogether, recognizing and leveraging people’s unique characteristics may benefit interactions by encouraging the work toward achieving beneficial results for all parties involved.Show less
