Foreign aid policies vary greatly in their means and ends. Long-term development policies, aiming to promote development and welfare, distinguish from short-term humanitarian policies that respond...Show moreForeign aid policies vary greatly in their means and ends. Long-term development policies, aiming to promote development and welfare, distinguish from short-term humanitarian policies that respond to humanitarian emergency crises. Politicians seem to differ in their preferences, leading scholars to question how these preferences emerge. Existing literature has been focusing on theories of elite competition in explaining why states construct and implement certain policies. However, these theories seem to ignore the concept of political agency, and grant no primacy to the role of ideas and values. This thesis aims to fill this gap by asking how party ideologies influence foreign aid policy preferences. It employs the discursive legitimation model of Van Leeuwen (2008) to analyze Dutch parliamentary debates. Here, it is found that conservative values affect politicians to refer to authorization and rationalization when legitimizing their preferences, while liberal values work through to moral evaluation and story-telling strategies. This confirms that ideas and ideologies do matter for policy preferences.Show less
This thesis explains the arms export control in EU Member States after the establishment of the European Code of Conduct (ECC)’s criteria, where the need to protect human rights is incorporated as...Show moreThis thesis explains the arms export control in EU Member States after the establishment of the European Code of Conduct (ECC)’s criteria, where the need to protect human rights is incorporated as one of its criteria. This thesis shows that, although EU Member States should only control their arms exports using the ECC’s criteria, the result of the controls on the exports of arms to third countries considered as human rights perpetrators in different Member States is not harmonized. This is because national parliament of each EU Member State might approve the exports of arms in their countries based on different reasons. Parliaments in the Member States that have more respect to human rights, like the Netherlands, can prevent their governments from granting the permits to the exports that carry risk of violation of human rights. The parliaments in the Member States that have less respect on human rights can still allow their governments to grant the permit for such exports because for them export revenues and bilateral relationship might be more important than human rights. This thesis shows that the national parliaments can control the exports of arms in their countries and prevent their governments from granting the permits to the exports that do not satisfy their wishes.Show less
