Existing studies have demonstrated the usefulness of dynamic training in developing children’s various cognitive abilities, such as cognitive flexibility and reasoning. Additionally, research has...Show moreExisting studies have demonstrated the usefulness of dynamic training in developing children’s various cognitive abilities, such as cognitive flexibility and reasoning. Additionally, research has also shown dynamic measures, such as posttest performance and the amount of training prompts to be significant predictors for children’s academic performance in reading and mathematics. However, there is little information about the effectiveness of dynamic training on the working memory performance of typically developing and younger primary school children. The current study was performed using a dynamic task of working memory with a pretest-training-posttest design. The participants of this study were 103 typically developing Dutch children between the ages of 8 and 9 years old (mean age = 8.55 years, 50.50% girls). Children were allocated into a control and experimental group, where the experimental group received dynamic training following the pretest using a graduated prompts approach, while the control group did not receive training. Our study found a statistically significant difference between the children’s performance at the pretest and posttest measures of the dynamic working memory task in both experimental groups. Inconsistent with previous research, children’s working memory performance regressed from pretest to posttest in both groups. Furthermore, in-line with previous research, we found that higher performance at posttest predicted higher academic performance in reading and mathematics for the experimental group. However, the number of prompts children received during dynamic training was not a significant predictor for their academic performance. Our findings indicated that the dynamic task for working memory profited children in both experimental groups to a limited extent. Additionally, dynamic measures of working memory, such as posttest score, had a predictive effect on children’s reading and mathematical performance in school. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of a shorter dynamic training procedure and the specific type of prompts that are most useful for children’s performance progression. Another implication for future research is to examine children’s concentration during dynamic testing. Practical implications include the application of dynamic testing along with static testing for a more comprehensive understanding about children’s learning needs and cognitive abilities.Show less
Research master thesis | Psychology (research) (MSc)
closed access
This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a newly developed dynamic screener to assess first year secondary school students’ potential for learning. Participants included 52 children ...Show moreThis study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a newly developed dynamic screener to assess first year secondary school students’ potential for learning. Participants included 52 children (mean age = 13.14) from different Dutch educational tracks. The dynamic screener consists of the subtests reading, mathematics, working memory, planning, divergent thinking, and inductive reasoning. Each subtest employs a test-training-test design. Based on randomized blocking, half of the children received a graduated prompts training between pre-test and post-test, while the other half did not. On some, but not all, subtests training seems to lead to an increase in performance. Additionally, some constructs measured through the dynamic screener relate to current school performance. This pilot study provides preliminary support to the use of such an instrument to gain more insight into children’s learning potential and instructional needs. Directions for future research are discussed.Show less
Dynamic testing seems to provide insight into children’s potential for learning. The current study aimed to gain more insight into the effectiveness of group-administered computerized dynamic...Show moreDynamic testing seems to provide insight into children’s potential for learning. The current study aimed to gain more insight into the effectiveness of group-administered computerized dynamic testing in potentially gifted children (N = 48), to further investigate the relationship with test anxiety, and to gain more insight into the instructional needs of the children. All groups of children showed a significant increase in correctly solving the analogies from pretest to post-test. A difference in progression between the dynamic testing condition and the control condition was found. However, this difference appeared not to be significant. In addition, although visual differences were found in the progression lines of children with different levels of test anxiety and their instructional needs, no statistically significant differences were found. Implications of the findings were described in the discussion. In conclusion, the computerized group-administered dynamic test might have practical advantages for educational or clinical practice but first requires more research.Show less
