The existing philosophical debate in pornography regulation is between liberals and radical feminists. However, this debate is currently stuck in a position where neither side is willing to...Show moreThe existing philosophical debate in pornography regulation is between liberals and radical feminists. However, this debate is currently stuck in a position where neither side is willing to incorporate the other side's concerns. This thesis aims to further this debate by viewing the debate from a new lens. It argues that neo-republicanism, specifically their understanding of freedom as non-domination, is a useful way of understanding the effects of pornography. Through this analysis, this thesis aims to assess whether pornography regulation is justifiable in a neo-republican approach.Show less
