The thematic stems are an important class within the Indo-European nominal morphology. This thesis seeks to analyze how the thematic class should be reconstructed for Proto-Anatolian and an early...Show moreThe thematic stems are an important class within the Indo-European nominal morphology. This thesis seeks to analyze how the thematic class should be reconstructed for Proto-Anatolian and an early stage of Indo-European, through the study of the class in the major Anatolian languages.Show less
This thesis investigates the synchronic and diachronic identity of the Anatolian stops, and their implications for Proto-Indo-European phonology and subgrouping. Ever since Sturtevant (1932), it...Show moreThis thesis investigates the synchronic and diachronic identity of the Anatolian stops, and their implications for Proto-Indo-European phonology and subgrouping. Ever since Sturtevant (1932), it has been known that etymologically Hittite cuneiform VC-CV (fortis) spellings go back to PIE *t, and V-CV (lenis) spellings to *d/dh. This has been taken to stand either for a synchronic voicing or length contrast. Through an examination of the origins and use of Hittite cuneiform, combined with phonological evidence, it is concluded that the underlying contrast must be length. A typological survey of geminate evolution and Proto-Anatolian phonology further concludes that this contrast must be original, and cannot emerge from a voicing contrast. Therefore the Nuclear-Proto-Indo-European *t~*d~*dh contrast is an innovation, and a *t:~*t~*? system must be reconstructed for Proto-Indo-European. This is evidence of a significant innovation that Proto-Anatolian did not take part in, and thus strong evidence for the Indo-Hittite Hypothesis.Show less
The Hieroglyphic Luwian script has a number of apparent homophonic symbols (homographs), primarily within the and series and “presumably to be explained in terms of original distinctions either...Show moreThe Hieroglyphic Luwian script has a number of apparent homophonic symbols (homographs), primarily within the and series and “presumably to be explained in terms of original distinctions either lost or not yet established by us”.1 The purpose of this paper will be to determine whether an underlying phonetic (or possibly phonological) quality distinct from the other signs can be identified for the sign . An accurate picture of the Hieroglyphic Luwian syllabary is key to understanding the language hidden beneath the script. In studying the nature of this sign, the scholar of Luwian will be better able to understand the phonetic and phonological system of Hieroglyphic Luwian, and to connect it to that of Proto-Anatolian and Proto-Indo-European. The paper will begin with an extended introduction detailing the historical position and linguistic features of the Luwian languages, as well as a brief discussion of the Anatolian Hieroglyphic script. Following this, data reflecting the distribution of the sign in the corpus will be presented alongside a discussion of the sign's linguistic environments. The next section will suggest possible interpretations of this data, utilising primarily comparative and etymological arguments. The paper will conclude with a suggested interpretation of the sign.Show less
