Politieke jongerenorganisaties (PJO's) maken sinds de jaren '40 onderdeel uit van het Nederlandse partijleven. Wat zijn politieke jongerenorganisaties eigenlijk, en hebben ze invloed? Aan de hand...Show morePolitieke jongerenorganisaties (PJO's) maken sinds de jaren '40 onderdeel uit van het Nederlandse partijleven. Wat zijn politieke jongerenorganisaties eigenlijk, en hebben ze invloed? Aan de hand van de geschiedenis van de PJO's, het aantal doorgestroomde landelijke politici en de congresactiviteiten van de jongeren, heb ik geprobeerd een indicatie van hun invloed te geven. Er lijkt een correlatie te zijn tussen partijstructuur en invloed van jongeren.Show less
Wat zijn de belangrijkste predictoren van de stemintentie bij Tweede Kamerverkiezingen van Hindoestaanse jongeren in Nederland? Om een antwoord op deze vraag te vinden heb ik een kwantitatief...Show moreWat zijn de belangrijkste predictoren van de stemintentie bij Tweede Kamerverkiezingen van Hindoestaanse jongeren in Nederland? Om een antwoord op deze vraag te vinden heb ik een kwantitatief onderzoek uitgevoerd onder Hindoestaanse jongeren in de leeftijd van 14-19 jaar die in Nederland wonen. Niet-Hindoestaanse jongeren in Nederland zijn in het onderzoek betrokken als vergelijkingsgroep. Het wetenschappelijk kader is een combinatie van de volgende drie theorieën: rational choice theory, resource availability theory en political socialization theory. De vragenlijst is via een websurvey (in Qualtrics) of op papier ingevuld. De steekproef omvatte 177 Hindoestaanse en 178 niet-Hindoestaanse respondenten die de vragenlijst volledig hebben ingevuld. Meer Hindoestaanse dan niet-Hindoestaanse jongeren hebben de intentie tot stemmen (76% respectievelijk 71%). Minder Hindoestaanse dan niet-Hindoestaanse jongeren geven aan waarschijnlijk niet of zeker niet te gaan stemmen (24% respectievelijk 29%). Subjectieve politieke kennis blijkt de belangrijkste predictor voor de stemintentie van de Hindoestaanse respondenten te zijn. De variantie in stemintentie van deze groep kon voor 24% worden ‘verklaard’. Voor de niet-Hindoestaanse respondenten geldt dat gepercipieerde stemintentie van de omgeving de belangrijkste predictor van stemintentie is. Maar voor deze groep respondenten zijn ook subjectieve politieke kennis en politieke interesse mede bepalend voor stemintentie. De verklaarde variantie in stemintentie van deze groep respondenten is 52%. Mijn onderzoeksresultaten bieden nieuwe inzichten in de variabelen met betrekking tot stemintentie van Hindoestanen die in Nederland wonen en waarnaar tot nu toe weinig onderzoek is verricht. De maatschappelijke relevantie is dat de Hindoestaanse gemeenschap via dit onderzoek inzicht krijgt om instrumenten te ontwikkelen om de stemintentie van Hindoestaanse jongeren te vergroten.Show less
My study focused on knowledge about the EU. It was my aim to explain the variance in this knowledge among Europeans and to answer the question: What explains the variance in the knowledge about...Show moreMy study focused on knowledge about the EU. It was my aim to explain the variance in this knowledge among Europeans and to answer the question: What explains the variance in the knowledge about European Union among European citizens?Show less
In this thesis the debate that led to the Dutch slavery momument is shown. This debate is compared with the English debate and other cases of historical injustice.
De Nederlandse regering besloot in 2011 twee keer tot inzet van de krijgsmacht in internationale missies in Afghanistan (Kunduz) en Libië. Opmerkelijk is het beperkte mandaat bij beide missies....Show moreDe Nederlandse regering besloot in 2011 twee keer tot inzet van de krijgsmacht in internationale missies in Afghanistan (Kunduz) en Libië. Opmerkelijk is het beperkte mandaat bij beide missies. Analyse van de politieke besluitvorming leidt tot de conclusie dat dit past in het beeld van domesticization van het buitenlandbeleid en lange termijn trends in de opstelling van Nederland in internationaal perpectief.Show less
In spite of the skeptical forecasts in the early 1990s when Brazil’s transition to democracy process was starting, this presidential regime is now considered stable. Therefore, the analyses in...Show moreIn spite of the skeptical forecasts in the early 1990s when Brazil’s transition to democracy process was starting, this presidential regime is now considered stable. Therefore, the analyses in political sciences today seek rather to explain how this process has evolved than to recommend profound changes in the system’s direction. This work is based on one of such theories, called the “Executive toolbox”. Its proponents contend that the president has tools that enable him or her to bring stability to the system through a balanced use of a set of tools in the Executive-Legislative relations. One of such tools is the budgetary prerogatives of the president - which, in the Brazilian case, include the liquidation of individual amendments of MPs. This thesis will study pork barrel politics in Brazil in comparative perspective and in relation to other tools in the president’s kit, especially with coalition goods. An existing debate in Brazilian literature about pork is taken as starting point and qualitative research methods are used including media analysis and personal interviews with Brazilian MPsShow less
The purpose of this thesis is to explore and test whether framing climate change as a security issue impacts the way non-state actors can participate in national and global climate change...Show moreThe purpose of this thesis is to explore and test whether framing climate change as a security issue impacts the way non-state actors can participate in national and global climate change policymaking. While it has been argued, in general terms, that securitizing an issue creates a state-centric security response, it has yet been untested to what extent this impacts environmental NGOs and civil society in climate change policymaking. After an analysis of the discourse on climate change over the past decade, I posit that since 2007 we have seen and will continue to see an increase of environmental NGOs indirectly excluded from climate change decision-making processes by states. This thesis, therefore, contends that climate change should be de-securitized and approached with a multidimensional climate change framework, incorporating a green theoretical standpoint. Drawing from an extensive questionnaire and two case-studies, I evaluate the role of non-state actors in climate change policymaking. The results suggest that the more climate change is framed as a security issue, the more non-state actors are indirectly excluded from climate change policymaking.Show less
This thesis argues that previous literature dealing with water scarcity conflicts and politics inside river basins misses out on important factors determining water scarcity. Hence, a political...Show moreThis thesis argues that previous literature dealing with water scarcity conflicts and politics inside river basins misses out on important factors determining water scarcity. Hence, a political geography and political ecology perspective is utilized in order to link international relations, political economy and geography. With this combination, concepts like food security, land-lease deals and their link with water scarcity are examined in order to illustrate that water scarcity is much more than water equity principles often found in transboundary river interaction between specific states. This thesis specifically focuses on the Nile Basin, most notably Egypt and Ethiopia in particular, and argues that many players from all over the world through investments and discursive practices interfere with Nile water allocation indirectly and obscurely. Hence, just hammering out a legal framework with Nile Basin riparians in not enough and should looked for in economic and discursive practices surrounding water scarcity.Show less
Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) is like soccer: there are supporters and opponents. Supporters credit BMD with providing full security against rogue states. Opponents fear a renewed arms race with...Show moreBallistic Missile Defense (BMD) is like soccer: there are supporters and opponents. Supporters credit BMD with providing full security against rogue states. Opponents fear a renewed arms race with Russia or China. There is another analogy: playing in the major league is awarding. Land-based and seabased missile defense each are attractive options, offering pros and cons to foreign policy makers, while military planners have to make tough decisions on how to allocate scarce defense resources in the face of austerity. A small or medium-sized state like the Netherlands has only a few policy options: emulate the policy of the hegemon, strive for national or European innovative solutions or (continue to) do nothing at all. Neoclassical realism holds that the state is not a black box in the anarchy of international relations, but that the foreign policy elite makes resource allocation decisions on the basis of its own perception of the external vulnerability of the state. State institutions, domestic influence groups and party politics in turn influence both threat perception and resource allocation. Resource allocation should ideally support the best foreign policy option to counter the perceived threat. Of course, external state actors, industrial and transnational organizations influence the foreign policy elite as well. Against this backdrop, the author uses the theoretical framework of neoclassical realism to research and describe the influence that domestic influence groups can exert on policy decisions regarding the Netherlands’ BMD capabilities. After a brief introduction into neoclassical realism, the external vulnerability is described in terms of the existing ballistic missile threat posed by Iran. The threat perception is approached form the eye of the beholder: regional actors, NATO as our primary security alliance and of course domestic actors. Then the primary BMD resources available to the Netherlands are described: operational capabilities, technological innovation and defense industrial base. External factors and domestic interest groups that affect resource allocation decisions, such as the international defense industry and national civic societal actors, are analyzed. The dominant foreign policy mantra that the Netherlands’ international reputation is at stake after incessant defense budget cuts and relinquishing our NATO commitments is also taken into account as a factor of influence. Finally, four adaptive strategies are researched as BMD policy options: blindly emulate US policy (with high investment costs), join European innovation policies (with high political and investment costs), do nothing (which eventually leads to a free rider status) or a mixed innovative emulation strategy (which attains foreign policy objectives appropriate for a small or medium power while at the same time promoting Dutch industrial interests). Research indicates that very few domestic actors actually oppose the Dutch role in BMD. The author concludes that the Netherlands cannot afford to lose its leading position in European BMD capabilities. Our reputation is firmly based on our Patriot capability, and for a long time we have punched above our weight. Our credibility is at risk – and maritime BMD is one of the very few niche capabilities that we hold as bargaining chip to promote our interests in international relations. The stakes are high – but so are the potential rewards.Show less
The European Union has become increasingly important in Dutch politics. The Dutch referendum on the Constitutional Treaty of 2005 marked a turning point, with a growing resistance to European...Show moreThe European Union has become increasingly important in Dutch politics. The Dutch referendum on the Constitutional Treaty of 2005 marked a turning point, with a growing resistance to European integration emerging. This study looks at the gap between Dutch MPs and Dutch voters in positions on European integration and finds that since the 2005 referendum the gap has all but closed.Show less
It is interesting to look at what kind of norm the Responsibility to Protect truly is and what the effect of the norm in practice truly is. In theory a norm that creates a responsibility for the...Show moreIt is interesting to look at what kind of norm the Responsibility to Protect truly is and what the effect of the norm in practice truly is. In theory a norm that creates a responsibility for the international community to act when gross human rights violations occur sounds perfect. But, is the norm as perfect in practice as it is on paper? Is the Responsibility to Protect norm specifically created as a political instrument for states to call on so they have grounds to surpass the concept of state sovereignty? In the case that the Responsibility to Protect norm can be seen as a political instrument, is this out of humanitarian reasons or out of political motives? What are the consequences of a norm like the Responsibility to Protect in practice? These questions make clear that I’m curious about the purpose and the use of the Responsibility to Protect norm and for that I will look at different case studies. In these cases the Responsibility to Protect norm will be tested on usefulness to stop the violation of human rights. In order to establish the usefulness of the Responsibility to Protect norm I use four cases. Two prior to the official establishment of the norm, the Kosovo and Chechnya case. And, two case studies after the establishment of the Responsibility to Protect norm in order to see why the international community did or did not use the norm in these human rights crisis. These cases are: Libya (2011) and Syria (2012). I know it is very early to use Libya and Syria as case studies but they are already until this point in history very important to make my argument. In these cases the international community is involved in one way or another, but not always in the way intended by the Responsibility to Protect norm. This makes it interesting to see whether or not the Responsibility to Protect norm is just another hollow norm on paper, without any real effect in practice.Show less
