In this thesis, I will discuss whether coercion theory can conform to intuitions that present generations have obligations of justice to future generations, taking those intuitions as a starting...Show moreIn this thesis, I will discuss whether coercion theory can conform to intuitions that present generations have obligations of justice to future generations, taking those intuitions as a starting point without defending them. A view which grounds obligations of justice in coercion is only able to do so when it can plausibly claim that relevant forms of coercion exist in the intergenerational realm. Only if this claim can be made, the scope of justice extends to future people. If not, the intuition cannot be accommodated and coercion theorists are faced with a dilemma: let go of the coercion view, or give up the intuition.Show less
This paper critically examines some of the assumptions underlying the non-identity problem. In particular the Time-Dependency claim and Person-Affecting Principle are at stake. I argue that the...Show moreThis paper critically examines some of the assumptions underlying the non-identity problem. In particular the Time-Dependency claim and Person-Affecting Principle are at stake. I argue that the Time-dependency claim can not be taken as a fact. Furthermore I argue that the Person-Affecting Principle concerning moral judgments can be retained. This would be possible by morally evaluating the predictable result of actions without regard of the identities of the persons affected.Show less